Welfare States and Religious Belief.



Brad Wilcox, a sociologist at the University of Virginia, is somewhat infamous for being one of the sociology department’s dedicated religious conservatives.  Wilcox tends to view religious belief as a net positive, and is generally something of an advocate for measures which encourage religious belief in the United States.  And while this isn’t a bad thing in and of itself, it does occasionally lead him to make arguments where he affirms the consequent.  For instance, Wilcox has a piece in the Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse web magazine, where he argues that social conservatives should be wary of Obama’s moves to expand government, because — if European social democracies are any indication — a robust welfare state is the enemy of a vibrant religious community.

  Here’s Wilcox:

recent study of 33 countries around the world by Anthony Gill and Erik Lundsgaarde, political scientists at the University of Washington, indicates that there is an inverse relationship between state welfare spending and religiosity. Specifically, they found that countries with larger welfare states had markedly lower levels of religious attendance, had higher rates of citizens indicating no religious affiliation whatsoever, and their people took less comfort in religion in general. In their words, “Countries with higher levels of per capita welfare have a proclivity for less religious participation and tend to have higher percentages of non-religious individuals.”

Gill and Lundsgaarde show, for instance, that Scandinavian societies such as Sweden and Denmark have some of the largest welfare states in the world as well as some of the lowest levels of religious attendance in the world. By contrast, countries with a history of limited government—from the United States to the Philippines—have markedly higher levels of religiosity. The link between religion and the welfare state remains robust even after Gill and Lundsgaarde control for socioeconomic factors such as urbanization, region, and literacy. The bottom line: as government grows, people’s reliance on God seems to diminish.

The explanation here is pretty straightforward.  There are some individuals who need religion to fulfill their spiritual needs, and will make their way to church and to worship regardless of the circumstances.  For the majority of churchgoers however, their attendance and participation in religious services has more to do with material need.  As Wilcox notes:

But other individuals only turn to churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques when their needs for social or material security are not being met by the market or state. In an environment characterized by ordinary levels of social or economic insecurity, many of these individuals will turn to local congregations for social, economic, and emotional support. At times of high insecurity, such as the current recession, religious demand goes even higher.

The more a government provides for the material well-being of its citizens, the more likely it is that “fair-weather” believers will leave the church in favor of other activities, or nothing at all.  This is a problem for Wilcox because he believes that religious communities and a robust atmosphere of religious belief are critical to maintaining the “moral fabric of families and civic institutions.”  For Wilcox, President Obama’s expansive agenda is a threat to the very institutions which bind individuals to each other and their communities.

The problem of course, is that it isn’t that simple.  In the social sciences, cross-cultural comparisons are very difficult, since you have to account for different norms, different demographics, entirely different institutional configurations, and a very different history.  And these problems are only compounded when you are trying to measure fairly ethereal things like religion and religiosity.  With regards the Wilcox’s essay, it simply isn’t enough to take the results of Gill and Lundsgaarde’s study and apply them to the United States.  I mean, circling around the welfare state as the explanatory factor for declining religiosity makes sense, but it ignores the critical impact of culture and history on any religious climate.

I’m clearly not a sociologist, but if I had to hazard a guess, it would be that an expanded welfare state will have a marginal impact on rates of religious attendance and belief in the United States.  Unlike Western Europe, which suffered through several centuries of a stifling, repressive central chuch followed by a century or two of vicious religious warfare, follwed again by several centures of a powerful church, the United States has had a relatively peaceful religious climate, and more importantly, an extraordinarily vibrant and diverse religious atmosphere.  We live in a marketplace of religious ideas, and religious denominations of all shapes and sizes compete vigorously for the attention of American believers.

This means two things for American religion: first that Americans are not on the whole hostile to religion or its effects, and second, that American religion is always moving and never stagnant.  The oppositie is true in Western Europe; there are many fewer religious denominations (I think the Catholic Church remains the largest), and those that exist have stagnated for decades.  If the presence of a welfare state has an impact on religious belief, it is only compounded by the state of European religion, and vice versa, mitigated by the state of American religion.  And what’s more, for many communities in the United States —  I’m thinking of Southern whites and African-Americans in particular — religion plays a huge part in civic life, and I doubt that will change even if the government’s reach is (barely) extended.

(h/t to Dmitry)

(cross-posted from U.S. of J.)

6 thoughts on “Welfare States and Religious Belief.

  1. quadmoniker March 9, 2009 at 12:30 pm Reply

    I’m not sure what Wilcox thinks we should do, either? Ensure a certain amount of human suffering so that religion can thrive? That doesn’t seem very religious. And I think we all know what Marx would say here, that people in states that have their most basic needs taken care of are actually able to see religion for what it is.

  2. Grump March 9, 2009 at 12:35 pm Reply

    I think the problem is how people see religion. is it a means to live better, than being a citizen in a welfare state would go in line with your belief system. However, if people see religion in a limited view as though it is a means for only getting out of tight jams, then we have a problem.

  3. G.D. March 9, 2009 at 2:36 pm Reply

    Can Wilcox prove that there is a correlation between religiosity and “maintaining the “moral fabric of families and civic institutions”? This seems inherently unquantifiable/immeasurable to me.

    • shani-o March 9, 2009 at 4:26 pm Reply

      That seems like one of those things people say because they don’t expect anyone else to question it.

    • Jamelle March 9, 2009 at 4:31 pm Reply

      If I remember correctly, Wilcox tries to judge that by measuring the degree to which citizens cheat on their taxes, and in the Nordic states – with their strong social safety nets – there apparently is a non-trivial percentage of people who try to escape their social obligation.

      The problem of course, is that that doesn’t prove anything.

      • G.D. March 10, 2009 at 12:20 pm Reply

        Right. It doesn’t prove anything.

        Americans, after all, profess a far higher degree of religiosity than almost any European country, and we still lead the West in handgun deaths by a significant margin. So what does that tell us about religion and societal morality? Not a whole hell of a lot, as the metric is pretty arbitrary.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: